Army clarifies CoA findings on ‘expired’ medicines

The Philippine Army    on Thursday    clarified that it did not procure  and subsequently distribute expired medicines to its troops in 2013  even as their primordial concern is the health of  troopers.

Army spokesman Col. Benjamin Hao said the facts contained in the Commission on Audit report  about the procurement of P37.5 million worth of medical kits was inaccurately interpreted by some in the media.

“The CoA report did not   say that we procured and distributed expired medicines…The [media] report said that what we distributed and procured are expired. We won’t allow such [erroneous reporting],” said Hao.

“We have to correct it and we are categorically saying right now that we are not procuring and distributing expired medicines to our troops. We give premium to the health of our troops, especially those that will save their lives. That ‘s the priority of the Army,” he added.   

Hao said the medical package consisting of 1,040 medical kits were supplied by BDM Enterprises on  June 18, 2013 and subsequently accepted by the Army’s Technical Inspection and Acceptance Committee on July 10, 2013.   

Hao said that 997 of the medical kits were distributed to various units in September 2014. However, 43 of which supposedly for the Army’s Training and Doctrine Command, were not withdrawn after finding that seven of the items were either expired or were expiring.

“Out of these 43 kits, the CoA noted that seven out of the 54 items found in the kits were either expiring or already expired,” he said. Hao could not say how many medical kits were inspected by CoA.

The medicines were supposed to expire in June 2015 or two years after the delivery.

The expired or expiring items found were ammonium nitrate, antibacterial ointment, chlorpheneramine maleate, sodium hypochlorite, IV infusion set, dry scrub, and chloroquine phosphate. 

COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.
AdvertisementGMA-Working Pillars of the House